Bangladesh ISP Billing Software: Local Provider Comparison

What this comparison covers

Bangladesh has several locally focused ISP billing platforms. They overlap on invoicing, subscriber records and MikroTik control, but differ in pricing model, reseller workflow, payment automation, fiber tooling, network operations and the breadth of the surrounding business suite.

This comparison covers ISPbills, ISP Digital, ISP Pay BD, BD Net ISP, ISP Dhaka, DreamSoft and Net Scale.

Bangladesh provider comparison at a glance

The table is a shortlist aid, not a winner declaration. “MikroTik integration,” for example, can mean anything from adding PPP secrets to handling RouterOS failures, queues, Hotspot, IPv6 pools and configuration read-back. The same applies to OLT, payments and accounting.

1. ISPbills

ISPbills publicly positions itself as an ISP operations platform rather than billing alone. Its current site describes active-subscriber pricing, a free monthly tier for up to 100 active subscribers, unlimited MikroTik and OLT devices, FreeRADIUS AAA, OLT/ONU management, reseller and sub-reseller workflows, network monitoring, GIS maps and regional gateway integrations.

This breadth is most relevant to an ISP trying to connect customer, billing, RADIUS, RouterOS, fiber and support evidence in one system. The trade-off to investigate is implementation scope: a broad platform requires careful role permissions, device onboarding and data migration. Buyers should ask which OLT vendors and firmware versions are proven for the exact data and actions they need.

Verify in a demo: reseller price floors; tenant isolation through direct customer URLs and autocomplete; delayed or duplicated bKash callbacks; RouterOS timeout and read-back; actual commands used for the selected OLT; export of customers, invoices, payments and activity history.

2. ISP Digital

ISP Digital’s official pages document subscriber billing together with MAC reseller and bandwidth reseller management. The site also lists MikroTik API integration, network diagrams, OLT integration for ONU information, reseller portals and Android applications. Its public pricing page presents multiple monthly tiers and separately notes that OLT integration carries an applicable charge.

That makes ISP Digital a logical shortlist candidate for operators with an established reseller structure or teams already familiar with its local workflow. Buyers should map each desired reseller level and permission explicitly because the words “reseller management” do not by themselves prove price-floor enforcement, cross-tenant isolation or sub-reseller depth.

Verify in a demo: the difference between MAC and bandwidth reseller workflows; OLT vendors included in the quoted add-on; local payment reconciliation; staff permissions; mobile app update policy; backup restoration and complete data export.

3. ISP Pay BD

ISP Pay BD’s public site emphasizes bKash and Nagad reconciliation, real-time MikroTik PPPoE and Hotspot synchronization, expiry and reconnection, reseller operations and a branded Bangla subscriber app. The page also advertises OLT/ONU visibility and RADIUS functions.

Its pricing presentation is distinctive within this group: fixed subscriber tiers sit beside a wallet-funded pay-as-you-go model. The public FAQ describes a platform component plus a per-active-user charge for that option. This may suit an ISP that wants usage-linked software cost, while finance should model wallet funding, minimums, optional branding and the price at actual growth points.

Verify in a demo: how payment matching handles the same mobile number across customers, unmatched transactions and reversals; what “real-time” sync means during a router timeout; OLT command/source support; RADIUS accounting integrity; wallet statements and export after cancellation.

4. BD Net ISP

BD Net ISP publicly lists automated billing, subscriber lifecycle management, MikroTik integration, bKash payment, SMS alerts and POP/reseller operations. Its site provides subscriber-based packages, a stated one-time setup charge and Standard/Premium monthly options, making initial cost comparison relatively direct.

This is worth evaluating for an ISP seeking a conventional local billing and MikroTik workflow without first buying a much wider enterprise suite. A published list still needs operational testing: successful RouterOS API submission is not the same as verified service state, and displaying bKash does not prove reconciliation of delayed, duplicated or reversed payments.

Verify in a demo: what Premium support adds; included user and router limits; customer portal payment verification; reseller ownership; package migration; SMS delivery evidence; and whether setup, migration, training and gateway work are included.

5. ISP Dhaka

ISP Dhaka’s official page promotes MikroTik PPPoE and Hotspot automation, bKash/Nagad payment collection, SMS billing, customer management, bandwidth monitoring, RADIUS-related functions and BTRC-oriented reporting. This public positioning targets the familiar operational stack of a Bangladesh access provider.

It deserves a place in a local demo round when these conventional billing and reporting requirements dominate. Because marketing labels can cover different implementation depths, buyers should request a current package sheet and a working demonstration rather than infer capability from the home page.

Verify in a demo: server-side payment verification; actual RADIUS architecture; MikroTik services and RouterOS releases supported; basis and update process for BTRC reports; reseller/sub-reseller permissions; OLT scope; audit history and restore procedure.

6. DreamSoft

DreamSoft approaches the category as a broader Bangladesh software provider. Its ISP product page lists subscriber management, customer portals, bKash/Nagad/Rocket payments, MikroTik control, equipment or ONU-related inventory, automated billing and compliance-focused reporting, with links into its accounting and inventory offerings.

This model may suit an ISP looking for one vendor to customize several back-office functions. The central evaluation question is where the ISP-specific product ends and custom ERP work begins. Buyers should identify which modules share a supported data model, which are integrations, and which requirements need paid customization.

Verify in a demo: live RADIUS and RouterOS behaviour rather than only CRM screens; OLT/ONU telemetry source; accounting integration and correction flows; upgrade impact on customization; implementation ownership; support SLA and export format.

7. Net Scale

Net Scale’s public site describes a Bangladesh-focused system for automated billing, client management and network monitoring. Its public structured information also exposed a BDT-denominated offer when reviewed. The accessible public material provided less implementation detail than several providers above, so it should be treated as a candidate for direct discovery rather than scored from assumptions.

Verify in a demo: current pricing and subscriber limits; supported MikroTik, RADIUS, OLT and payment workflows; reseller model; customer portal; accounting exports; audit records; backups, migration and support coverage.

Capability matrix: public claim versus proof

Which provider fits which shortlist?

• For integrated NOC, RADIUS, OLT and billing: start by testing ISPbills, then include any vendor willing to demonstrate the same end-to-end network cases.
• For established MAC or bandwidth reseller operations: include ISP Digital and compare its exact hierarchy and mobile workflows with ISPbills and ISP Pay BD.
• For payment-led automation and flexible PAYG software pricing: examine ISP Pay BD closely and compare reconciliation against every other shortlisted product.
• For a straightforward local MikroTik billing stack: place BD Net ISP and ISP Dhaka in the demo round.
• For billing alongside customized accounting, CRM and inventory: assess DreamSoft’s broader suite and the long-term maintenance terms for customization.
• For additional local coverage: ask Net Scale for a current capability and pricing demonstration rather than excluding it because public detail is limited.

Run the same acceptance test with every provider

1. Create organizational roles. Set up group administrator, operator, sub-operator, manager, NOC, accounts and support users with different permissions.
2. Test tenant isolation. Try customer direct URLs, search suggestions, ticket forms, reports, exports and API calls from the wrong account.
3. Complete one subscriber lifecycle. Create, provision, invoice, collect, recharge, migrate package, suspend, restore and close the test customer.
4. Break MikroTik connectivity. Disconnect or delay the router during an update and inspect whether the platform shows pending, failed or falsely completed work.
5. Break payment sequencing. Replay callbacks, delay the browser return, send an incorrect amount and process a reversal.
6. Verify reseller price controls. Attempt to sell below the rate assigned by the parent and bypass the form with a direct request.
7. Inspect fiber evidence. For OLT claims, use your actual vendor and compare displayed identity, VLAN, ONU status, signal and uptime with device CLI.
8. Restore a backup. Ask the vendor to restore a test environment and prove application data, secrets and network mappings are usable.
9. Export before buying. Obtain customer, package, invoice, payment, session, activity and device data in documented formats.

How to make the final decision

Do not assign points merely because a website says “bKash,” “MikroTik,” “OLT” or “BTRC.” Score the demonstrated workflow, failure behaviour, authorization boundary, audit evidence, current written price and contractual support.

A smaller ISP may value a fast, focused local deployment. A reseller-led ISP may prioritize hierarchy and price control. A fiber operator may need proven OLT commands and topology. A growing multi-team provider may need RADIUS, NOC, accounting and role separation in the same operational model.

There is no honest universal winner without those requirements. The best Bangladesh ISP billing provider is the one that passes your test cases with the fewest unsupported assumptions—and leaves you with a clear migration, recovery and exit path.

Source note: provider positioning and pricing descriptions were reviewed from the official public websites linked above on August 5, 2026. They are summarized for buyer comparison and may change. ISPbills has an unavoidable commercial interest in this topic; readers should verify every product, including ISPbills, through a written proposal and controlled proof of concept.